U.S. & Colombia discuss major military bases agreement

A map locates Colombian military bases that may soon share space with U.S. military forcesEarlier today, the Fellowship of Reconciliation reported on negotiations between the Obama administration and Colombia President Alvaro Uribe's administration toward as many as five U.S. military bases in Colombia. This stunning proposal was confirmed later today in an Associated Press story authored by journalist Frank Bajak (The map at left locates Colombian military bases that may soon share space with U.S. military forces):

© 2009 The Associated Press

BOGOTA — The United States and Colombia are nearing agreement on expanding the U.S. military's presence in this conflict-torn nation, potentially basing hundreds of Americans in a central valley to support Air Force drug interdiction missions.

Both sides say they hope a fifth round of talks slated for later this month in Bogota will seal a 10-year lease deal.

Opponents worry a broadened U.S. military role in the world's No. 1 cocaine-producing nation could antagonize Colombia's leftist neighbors and draw Washington deeper into Colombia's complicated, long-running conflict with leftist rebels and rightist paramilitaries.

At a public hearing Wednesday called after criticism of secrecy surrounding the talks, three Colombian ministers defended the pending accord as vital in the fight against drug trafficking and "terrorism."

"We're not ceding even a piece of territory," said acting Defense Minister Gen. Freddy Padilla. The accord would not authorize the U.S. military to use force in Colombia, and all its activities would have to be approved by the host government, he said.

Most details of the negotiations are secret, but senior Colombian military and civilian officials familiar with negotiations told The Associated Press that the idea is to make Colombia a regional hub for Pentagon operations — though without exceeding a limit of 1,400 U.S. military personnel and contractors set by the U.S. Congress.

Padilla said the deal would initially involve three air bases, principally Palanquero on the Magdalena river 100 kilometers (60 miles) northwest of Bogota. The other two bases are Apiay on Colombia's eastern plains and Malambo on the Caribbean coast, he said.

The senior Colombian officials, who agreed to describe the negotiations only if their identities were not revealed, said the current draft accord also specifies more frequent "visits" by U.S. warships to two naval bases, at Malaga Bay on the Pacific and Cartagena on the Caribbean. Colombia could also get preferential treatment in arms and aircraft purchases.

The U.S. interdiction missions that the Palanquero air base would take on — identifying suspect vessels and planes so Coast Guard and Navy ships can intercept them and look for drugs — have been flown out of Manta, Ecuador, on the Pacific Ocean. About 220 Americans shared space at Manta's international airport but were allowed no more than eight planes at a time.

The E-3 AWACs and P-3 Orion surveillance planes based in Manta were credited with about 60 percent of drug interdiction in the eastern Pacific. But the U.S. mission there is shutting down this week because President Rafael Correa refused to renew its lease, calling their presence a violation of Ecuador's sovereignty.

Colombia's Palanquero base had been off-limits to U.S. military operations until April 2008 because of human rights issues: A Colombian military helicopter operating from there killed 17 civilians in a 1998 bombing of a northern town that was initially covered up.

A bill passed by the U.S. House and pending in the Senate would earmark $46 million for construction at Palanquero, which has a 3,500-meter (11,550-foot) runway and two huge hangars. The base is home to Colombia's main fighter wing.

The money would be released 15 days after a base agreement is signed.

The U.S. Embassy declined to comment about the talks. Asked recently about the talks, U.S. Ambassador William Brownfield stressed that Washington would not be acquiring bases but rather obtaining increased access to Colombian facilities.

A spokesman for the U.S. military's Southern Command, Robert Appin, said the Pentagon would have no immediate comment.

However, one indication of the Pentagon's goals can be found in a U.S. Air Mobility Command document, "Global En Route Strategy," presented in early April at a symposium at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama.

Beyond counternarcotics, the document says, Palanquero could become a "cooperative security location" from which "mobility operations could be executed" — that is, a potential jumping-off point for operations by expeditionary forces.

"Nearly half the continent can be covered by a C-17 (military transport) without refueling" from Palanquero, the document says.

Rafael Pardo, a former Colombian defense minister who is running for president in the May 2010 election, has complained of secrecy surrounding the negotiations and worries about alienating other South American nations. The radar and communications intercept ability of U.S. aircraft can extend well beyond Colombia's borders.

"If it's to launch surveillance flights over other nations then it seems to me that would be needless hostility by Colombia against its neighbors," Pardo said.

At Wednesday's hearing, Foreign Minister Jaime Bermudez said the agreement would specify that U.S. flights would not cross Colombia's borders without permission from affected countries. "This is a bilateral accord whose scope is exclusively in Colombian territory," he said.

It is not clear what other restrictions would be placed under a new bases agreement on U.S. military aircraft, warships or troops. Putting more Americans on the ground would raise the risk of casualties, although Colombia's leftist rebels — chiefly financed by cocaine trafficking — have no record of attacking Americans in the country.

About 600 U.S. military personnel and civilian contractors already work in Colombia, according to the most recent figures. Advisers are attached to Colombian army divisions, have their own offices at armed forces headquarters and have trained thousands of Colombian troops since 2000.

Under U.S. law, the number of Defense Department employees in Colombia cannot exceed 800 while the number of military contractors cannot top 600.

That number would not change under the draft accord, the senior Colombian officials said. Nor, they said, would U.S. troops lose their immunity from criminal prosecution.

While drug interdiction is the chief U.S. goal, some worry that bringing in more Americans will lead to the U.S. taking sides in a conflict involving Colombia's military, rebels and private militias over land and cocaine that has led to hundreds of killings of civilians over the years.

The U.S. could be pushing Colombia to negotiate a settlement with the leftist rebels, said John Lindsay-Poland of the U.S.-based Fellowship of Reconciliation. Instead, "this is an indicator that the United States is going to be supporting a military approach."

US counter-nacotics in Colombia ignored law of supply and demand

If and only if the stated goal is true,then it clearly violates the law of supply and demand.

According to the U.S Department of Justice,Bureau of Justice Statistics, 114 million People in the U.S. age of 12 or older,which represent 46% of the population,reported illicit drug use at least once in their life time. Another study indicates that 80% of 7.3 million prisoners in U.S prison are for drugs. Another study shows that one in five between the age of 16 ad 59 said that they had taken drugs;Nearly one out of 5 workers age 18 to 25 used illicit drugs; 24% of men and 16% of women are taken drugs; pregnant women who use drugs increases their risk of miscarriage;babies born to mother who use cocaine through their pregnancy may also have smaller head and learning difficulties.
People that use drugs will always find a way to get it.Trying to cut the supply while the demand is high will inflate the price in inverse proportion to its scarcity; it will exponentially worsening the crime rate; It will provides profit motive for a legion of opportunists, profiteers,and corrupt people at every level that will find an opportunity to get rich very fast; thereby,weakening national security since their allegiance is to money.
The drug users are the root of this problem. Illegal mood altering chemicals are available because of a a huge demand for them.To uproot or abate the problem, logic dictates that proactive intervention against illegal drug uses is crucial. That should start from elementary school to post graduate school and beyond. This is the best way to reduce the number of illicit drug users and abusers.
Once they started using drugs, it is very hard to for them to stop.They become unemployed and progressively unemployable because of their worsening drug addiction.
Those that are already incarcerated in this chemical jail, should be given strong incentive to abandon their destructive life style; sending them to a physical jail makes it a double incarceration and exacerbate their problems.They have to deal with their chemical problems then they have to deal with the perplexities of the penal system that also fail to give them a marketable skill that will allow them to become productive. For some,upon their release,the prison contact makes them more resourceful and street wise in term of finding more drugs and committing more crimes to get the drugs.
Drug abuse is a symptom that reflects some erosion in the mores and the value system in society. To address and redress the problem, more research is needed not necessary more money.
To implement this,the government should select an ad hoc Task Force composed of of interdisciplinary Academicians and lay persons that reflect a cross section of the population. Most of the Academicians should be Social Sciences Major.Lay persons input should have equal weight with the Academicians input because the Academicians have been seeking solution to the drug problem since the last 80 years without noticeable success.
The Task Force will have several divisions and Chapters. The number of Chapters will be proportional to the size of the community.Each Chapter will consist of a Think Tank group that will investigates and analyzes the problem with the local lay person and will try to find appropriate solutions that affect that particular community.
The Academic community should be represented by the following professionals : Physicians, Economists, Political Scientists, Communications Major,Criminologists, Sociologists, Anthropologists, Psychologists, Psychiatrists, Philosophers,Computer Scientists,Lawyers, Judges, Librarians, Linguists, Professors,Teachers,School Counselors,Carrier Counselors,Marriage Counselors.
Lay persons such as:,Union Leaders,9-1-1 Operators,EMS Workers,Police Officers,Detectives,Firemen,Cashiers,Bankers,Industry leaders ,Bartender,Nurse,Social workers, Ex drug dealers,drug counselor,current and former drug addict .
For the purpose of check and balance and to minimizes the group think aberration,it would be a good idea to have people from different cultures in those panels.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <span> <p> <br> <blockquote> <hr> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.